Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
Int J Public Health ; 68: 1605688, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270760

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate the mediating effects of anxiety and depression in the relationship between insomnia and burnout among Chinese nurses under the regular COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control. Methods: Convenience sampling was applied to recruit 784 nurses in Jiangsu Province, China. The respondents completed the survey via mobile devices. Demographic questionnaire, Insomnia Severity Index, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Maslach Burnout Inventory were used to assess demographic information, insomnia, anxiety, depression, and burnout, respectively. Hayes PROCESS macro was employed to examine the mediation model. Results: Insomnia, anxiety, depression and burnout were positively and significantly associated with each other. Anxiety and depression played partial mediation effects between insomnia and burnout with the mediation effect of anxiety and depression accounting for 28.87% and 31.69% of the total effect, respectively. Conclusion: Insomnia may lead to burnout through the parallel mediating effects of anxiety and depression in Chinese nurses. Interventions on sleep, anxiety and depression from the hospital management were essential to ameliorate nurses' burnout status under the regular COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , COVID-19 , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Humanos , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Depresión/epidemiología , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología
2.
Front Public Health ; 10: 1088246, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2232961

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate mental health status and its associated factors among female nurses in the normalization of COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control in China. Methods: Random cluster sampling was applied to recruit 740 female nurses in China. The respondents completed the survey with mobile devices. Demographic questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Insomnia Severity Index, and The Impact of Event Scale-Revised were used to assess demographic Information, anxiety, depression, insomnia and PTSD symptoms, respectively. The associated factors of mental health status were identified by binary logistic regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of anxiety and depression was 7.9 and 17.8%, respectively. Insomnia was an associated factor of anxiety (OR = 6.237, 95%CI = 6.055-23.761, P < 0.001) and depression (OR = 9.651, 95%CI = 5.699-22.370, P < 0.001), while PTSD was an associated factor of anxiety (OR = 11.995, 95%CI = 2.946-13.205, P < 0.001) and depression (OR = 11.291, 95%CI = 6.056-15.380, P < 0.001), Being married was a protective factor of depression (OR = 0.811, 95%CI = 1.309-6.039, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Female nurses showed problems in mental health. Insomnia, PTSD and marital status were associated with mental health. The hospital management should pay more attention to the unmarried groups, and strive to improve the sleep quality of female nurses and reduce their stress caused by traumatic events.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Depresión/psicología , China/epidemiología , Estado de Salud
3.
Front Public Health ; 10: 1049006, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2224937

RESUMEN

Background: Presently, the omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) dominates amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but its clinical characteristics with intrinsic severity and organ tropism remain understudied. Methods: We reported 1,001 mild COVID-19 patients that were infected with the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalized in China from February to June 2022, including their demographic information, medical/immunization history, clinical symptom, and hematological profile. Patients with one-, two- and three-dose vaccination were compared to assess the vaccine effectiveness. Importantly, liver damage caused by the omicron variant infection was evaluated, in comparison to that caused by the wild-type or the delta variant SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: For the reported COVID-19 patients infected by the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, their median age was 36.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 26.0-50.0] and 49.7% were female. Hypertension, diabetes, and bronchitis were the leading comorbidities, and asymptomatic patients took up a major portion (61.2%). While most hematological parameters revealed the alleviated pathogenicity, full vaccination or booster shot showed effective protection against clinical severity. Furthermore, liver damages caused by viral infection of the omicron variant were largely attenuated when compared to those by infection of the wild-type or the delta variant SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions: Our results supported that the viremic effect of the omicron variant tended to be modest, while the liver damage caused by this strain became milder than the previous circulating variants.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Pandemias , Vacunación
4.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 837411, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2198964

RESUMEN

Studies have discovered that wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infections are commonly linked to abnormalities in the hematological profiles of COVID-19 patients, one such abnormality being characterized by elevations in red blood cell distribution width (RDW). Whether this linkage reoccurs in delta variant SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unexamined. Here we compared baseline blood parameters in COVID-19 patients infected by wild type and its delta variant, respectively. Our results here point to that although the delta variant has shown increased virulence, transmissibility, and vaccine escape, it has a minimally negative impact on RDW values that were previously found prognostic for COVID-19 severity.

5.
Frontiers in public health ; 10, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2147816

RESUMEN

Background Presently, the omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) dominates amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but its clinical characteristics with intrinsic severity and organ tropism remain understudied. Methods We reported 1,001 mild COVID-19 patients that were infected with the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalized in China from February to June 2022, including their demographic information, medical/immunization history, clinical symptom, and hematological profile. Patients with one-, two- and three-dose vaccination were compared to assess the vaccine effectiveness. Importantly, liver damage caused by the omicron variant infection was evaluated, in comparison to that caused by the wild-type or the delta variant SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results For the reported COVID-19 patients infected by the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, their median age was 36.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 26.0-50.0] and 49.7% were female. Hypertension, diabetes, and bronchitis were the leading comorbidities, and asymptomatic patients took up a major portion (61.2%). While most hematological parameters revealed the alleviated pathogenicity, full vaccination or booster shot showed effective protection against clinical severity. Furthermore, liver damages caused by viral infection of the omicron variant were largely attenuated when compared to those by infection of the wild-type or the delta variant SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions Our results supported that the viremic effect of the omicron variant tended to be modest, while the liver damage caused by this strain became milder than the previous circulating variants.

6.
Front Public Health ; 10: 981233, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2023006

RESUMEN

Background: We compared the clinical characteristics of the patients with COVID-19, infected by the wild type or delta variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in connection with those of patients with seasonal influenza, all in mild cases. Methods: We retrospectively studied 245 and 115 patients with mild COVID-19 infected by the wild type and the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, respectively, with their demographic information, medical history, and laboratory data from hospital records, individually compared to 377 patients with mild seasonal influenza, before and after individual treatment. Results: Compared to the influenza cohort, the COVID-19 cohort or the COVID-19 delta variant cohort demonstrated younger median age, lower male ratio, and shorter duration from disease onset to hospitalization. Hypertension remained the top comorbidity among all cohorts. Based on patients' data upon hospitalization, the correlation of clinical characteristics between patients with influenza and those with the wild-type COVID-19 is greater than that between patients with influenza and those with the delta variant COVID-19. Individual treatment in each viral disease alleviated most hematological parameters, but some compromised biomarkers at the time of hospital discharge revealed persistent renal or myocardial impairment among patients with COVID-19 and influenza in recovery. Conclusion: Timely and proper treatment using broad-spectrum antibiotics and antiviral drugs could moderately alleviate the acute viremia and possible bacterial co-infection in patients with mild COVID-19 and influenza, followed by compromised recovery. To prepare for the flu season amid the COVID-19 pandemic, preventive and adequate immunizations of both flu and COVID-19 vaccines, as well as specific therapeutics to effectively reverse viral impairments, are in urgent need.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estaciones del Año
7.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 912367, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1865456

RESUMEN

Background: Currently, as the omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surges amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, its clinical characteristics with intrinsic severity and the protection from vaccination have been understudied. Methods: We reported 169 COVID-19 patients that were infected with the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalized in Suzhou, China, from February to March 2022, with their demographic information, medical/immunization history, clinical symptom, and hematological profile. At the same time, patients with none/partial (one-dose), full (two-dose) and three-dose vaccination were also compared to assess the vaccine effectiveness. Findings: For the omicron COVID-19 patients included in this study, their median age was 33.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 24.0-45.5], 53.3% were male and the median duration from illness onset to hospitalization was 2 days. Hypertension, bronchitis, and diabetes were the leading comorbidities among patients. While the common clinical symptoms included cough, fever, expectoration, and fatigue, etc., asymptomatic patients took up a significant portion (46.7%). For hematological parameters, most values revealed the alleviated pathogenicity induced by the omicron variant infection. No critically ill or deceased patients due to COVID-19 infection were reported in this study. Interpretation: Our results supported that the viremic effect of the omicron variant became milder than the previous circulating variants, while full vaccination or booster shot was greatly desired for an effective protection against clinical severity.

8.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 13: 861443, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1862595

RESUMEN

Background: Diabetes is one of the most common comorbidities in COVID-19 patients that pertains to disease severity, but the causal mechanism regarding its negative impact on COVID-19 outcome has yet been uncovered. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 459 COVID-19 patients admitted in early 2020 and 336 COVID-19 patients admitted in August 2021, with their demographic information, medical history, vaccination status (if applied), and laboratory data reported. Results: Among COVID-19 patients, compared to the non-diabetic group, the diabetic group exhibited elder age, higher proportion of patients with other major comorbidities, more severe dysfunction of innate immune cells, more refractory blood coagulopathy and more detrimental organ damage. For the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection, diabetic comorbidity was associated with COVID-19 severity but not mortality, and the glycemic levels in the non-diabetic group upon infection experienced high and analogous to those in the diabetic group. Besides, infected by the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, the non-diabetic patients did not demonstrate hyperglycemia, and despite different vaccination statuses, the diabetic patients exhibited comparable antibody responses to non-diabetic, showing the robustness of acquired immunity. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection may superimpose the deterioration of innate immune systems in diabetic patients, which contributes to their worsened disease outcome, but timely COVID-19 immunization could provide adequate protection in diabetic population that leads to favored prognosis.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Frontiers in medicine ; 9, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1728587

RESUMEN

Studies have discovered that wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infections are commonly linked to abnormalities in the hematological profiles of COVID-19 patients, one such abnormality being characterized by elevations in red blood cell distribution width (RDW). Whether this linkage reoccurs in delta variant SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unexamined. Here we compared baseline blood parameters in COVID-19 patients infected by wild type and its delta variant, respectively. Our results here point to that although the delta variant has shown increased virulence, transmissibility, and vaccine escape, it has a minimally negative impact on RDW values that were previously found prognostic for COVID-19 severity.

10.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 792135, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1633356

RESUMEN

Background: As delta variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) prevailed in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, its clinical characteristics with the difference from those of wild-type strains have been little studied. Methods: We reported one cohort of 341 wild-type patients with COVID-19 admitted at Wuhan, China in 2020 and the other cohort of 336 delta variant patients with COVID-19 admitted at Yangzhou, China in 2021, with comparisons of their demographic information, medical history, clinical manifestation, and hematological data. Furthermore, within the delta variant cohort, patients with none, partial, and full vaccination were also compared to assess vaccine effectiveness. Findings: For a total of 677 patients with COVID-19 included in this study, their median age was 53.0 years [interquartile range (IQR): 38.0-66.0] and 46.8% were men. No difference was found in age, gender, and percentage of patients with the leading comorbidity between wild-type and delta variant cohorts, but delta variant cohort showed a lessened time interval between disease onset to hospitalization, a reduced portion of patients with smoking history, and a lowered frequency of clinical symptoms. For hematological parameters, most values demonstrated significant differences between wild-type and delta variant cohorts, while full vaccination rather than partial vaccination alleviated the disease condition. This reflected the viremic effect of delta variant when vaccination succeeds or fails to protect. Interpretation: Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 may cause severe disease profiles, but timely diagnosis and full vaccination could protect patients with COVID-19 from worsened disease progression.

11.
Exp Hematol Oncol ; 10(1): 34, 2021 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1526660

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One year into the coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic we analyzed the blood coagulopathy in severe and non-severe COVID-19 patients and linked to those of influenza patients for a comparative study. METHODS: We reported 461 COVID-19 patients and 409 seasonal influenza patients admitted at separated medical centers. With their demographic data and medical history, hematological profiles with coagulation characters were emphasized, and compared between two cohorts before and after treatment. RESULTS: For 870 patients included in this study, their median age was (64.0, 51.0-76.0), and among them 511 (58.7%) were male. Hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and bronchitis constituted the leading comorbidities. Upon hospital admission blood test results differentiated COVID-19 patients from influenza cases, and for COVID-19 patients, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia were associated with disease severity and mortality. In addition, COVID-19 cohort demonstrated a prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), increased INR, shortened thrombin time and decreased fibrinogen, compared to those in influenza cohort, leaving D-dimer levels indistinguishably high between both cohorts. Platelet hyperreactivity in COVID-19 is more evident, associated with worse hyper-inflammatory response and more refractory coagulopathy. For severe COVID-19 patients administered with anticoagulants, bleeding incidence was substantially higher than others with no anticoagulant medications. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of coagulation characteristics between COVID-19 and influenza infections provides an insightful view on SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and its coagulopathic mechanism, proposing for therapeutic improvement.

12.
Front Psychiatry ; 12: 740094, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1403513

RESUMEN

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted people's life across the globe. In a public health crisis, rural adolescents are more prone to mental health problems. The current study aimed to investigate the prevalence of depressive symptoms among Chinese rural adolescents during the COVID-19 outbreak, and examine the association between perceived social support and depressive symptoms and its underlying mechanisms. Method: Perceived Social Support Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were administrated to 826 rural adolescents from Anhui Province, China, amid the COVID-19 crisis. Mackinnon's four-step procedure was employed to examine the mediating effect, while Hayes PROCESS macro was utilized to test the moderated mediation model. Results: The results showed the rate of depressive symptoms among rural adolescents in China was 77.6% during the outbreak of COVID-19. Female left-behind students and non-left-behind students from disrupted families experienced more depressive symptoms (all P < 0.05). Loneliness mediated the association between perceive social support and depressive symptoms and the indirect effect was stronger in left-behind adolescents in comparison to non-left-behind adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Depressive symptoms are extremely prevalent among Chinese rural adolescents during the COVID-19 outbreak, and perceived social support plays a protective role against depressive symptoms. Chinese rural adolescents, especially left-behind students, could benefit from the interventions aimed at enhancing the perceived social support and reducing loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

13.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 666629, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1394777

RESUMEN

Background: Amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we analyzed clinical characteristics of acute lung injury (ALI) in COVID-19 patients and reported their similarity and dissimilarity to those of non-COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We reported on 90 COVID-19 and 130 non-COVID-19 ALI patients in the ICUs of multiple centers. Demographic data, medical histories, laboratory findings, and radiological images were analyzed and compared between the two cohorts and within each cohort between survivors and non-survivors. For ALI survivors, clinical characteristics before and after treatment were also compared. Findings: Aberrations in blood parameters, such as leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and thrombocytopenia, were observed in both cohorts. More characteristic abnormalities, including significantly higher red cell distribution width (RDW), C-reactive proteins, and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) but lower troponin (TnT) and procalcitonin, were observed in the COVID-19 cohort than in the non-COVID-19 cohort, whereas D-dimer levels showed a similar elevation in both cohorts. The COVID-19 cohort also showed more diversified CT patterns where severe features such as consolidations and crazy paving patterns were more frequently observed. Multivariate analysis indicated that age, fever symptom, prothrombin time, procalcitonin, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, oxygenated hemoglobin, and crazy paving patterns in CT scans were independent risk factors associated with COVID-19. Interpretation: Comparison of ALI characteristics between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients in the ICU setting provided insight into the pathogenesis of ALI induced by different risk factors, suggesting distinct treatment plans.

14.
Psychol Health Med ; 27(2): 367-378, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1205490

RESUMEN

Healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are not immune to stressors. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) among HCWs during the COVID-19 epidemic and investigate the associations among negative coping, fatigue and PTSS. A total of 507 HCWs from Anhui province enrolled in the study and completed the cross-sectional survey including demographic data, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), 14-item Fatigue Scale (FS-14), and PTSD Checklist-civilian Version (PCL-C). Univariate linear regression, Pearson correlation and Mackinnon's four-step procedure were performed in the statistical analysis. Results indicated that the prevalence of PTSS among HCWs during the pandemic was 24%. Univariate linear regression showed HCWs aged 31-40 years exhibited significantly higher scores of PTSS than those aged 51-60 (ß = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.59 to 9.41). Having at least one child was associated with a higher risk of developing PTSS (ß = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.36 to 5.45). Negative coping and fatigue were positively correlated with all three PTSS (all P < 0.001), including re-experiencing, avoidance and hyper-arousal. Fatigue has mediated the association between negative coping and PTSS among HCWs during the pandemic (ab = 0.09, SE = 0.03, bootstrap 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.14). A considerable proportion of HCWs was traumatized during the COVID-19 outbreak. Hence, the institutions should screen out and pay close attention to HCWs who tend to use negative coping (e.g., withdrawal thinking, distraction and blaming others) and arrange work scientifically to avoid overfatigue and PTSS amid the public health crisis.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Fatiga/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología
15.
J Med Virol ; 93(3): 1512-1519, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1196466

RESUMEN

As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crashed into the influenza season, clinical characteristics of both infectious diseases were compared to make a difference. We reported 211 COVID-19 patients and 115 influenza patients as two separate cohorts at different locations. Demographic data, medical history, laboratory findings, and radiological characters were summarized and compared between two cohorts, as well as between patients at the intensive care unit (ICU) andnon-ICU within the COVID-19 cohort. For all 326 patients, the median age was 57.0 (interquartile range: 45.0-69.0) and 48.2% was male, while 43.9% had comorbidities that included hypertension, diabetes, bronchitis, and heart diseases. Patients had cough (75.5%), fever (69.3%), expectoration (41.1%), dyspnea (19.3%), chest pain (18.7%), and fatigue (16.0%), etc. Both viral infections caused substantial blood abnormality, whereas the COVID-19 cohort showed a lower frequency of leukocytosis, neutrophilia, or lymphocytopenia, but a higher chance of creatine kinase elevation. A total of 7.7% of all patients possessed no abnormal sign in chest computed tomography (CT) scans. For both infections, pulmonary lesions in radiological findings did not show any difference in their location or distribution. Nevertheless, compared to the influenza cohort, the COVID-19 cohort presented more diversity in CT features, where certain specific CT patterns showed significantly more frequency, including consolidation, crazy paving pattern, rounded opacities, air bronchogram, tree-in-bud sign, interlobular septal thickening, and bronchiolar wall thickening. Differentiable clinical manifestations and CT patterns may help diagnose COVID-19 from influenza and gain a better understanding of both contagious respiratory illnesses.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Bronquitis/complicaciones , Comorbilidad , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/complicaciones , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
17.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 9(1): 78, 2020 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-617375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is now a global public threat. Given the pandemic of COVID-19, the economic impact of COVID-19 is essential to add value to the policy-making process. We retrospectively conducted a cost and affordability analysis to determine the medical costs of COVID-19 patients in China, and also assess the factors affecting their costs. METHODS: This analysis was retrospectively conducted in Shandong Provincial Chest Hospital between 24 January and 16 March 2020. The total direct medical expenditures were analyzed by cost factors. We also assessed affordability by comparing the simulated out-of-pocket expenditure of COVID-19 cases relative to the per capita disposable income. Differences between groups were tested by student t test and Mann-Whitney test when appropriate. A multiple logistic regression model was built to determine the risk factors associated with high cost. RESULTS: A total of 70 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis. The overall mean cost was USD 6827 per treated episode. The highest mean cost was observed in drug acquisition, accounting for 45.1% of the overall cost. Total mean cost was significantly higher in patients with pre-existing diseases compared to those without pre-existing diseases. Pre-existing diseases and the advanced disease severity were strongly associated with higher cost. Around USD 0.49 billion were expected for clinical manage of COVID-19 in China. Among rural households, the proportions of health insurance coverage should be increased to 70% for severe cases, and 80% for critically ill cases to avoid catastrophic health expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that clinical management of COVID-19 patients incurs a great financial burden to national health insurance. The cost for drug acquisition is the major contributor to the medical cost, whereas the risk factors for higher cost are pre-existing diseases and severity of COVID-19. Improvement of insurance coverage will need to address the barriers of rural patients to avoid the occurrence of catastrophic health expenditure.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , China , Infecciones por Coronavirus/economía , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Pandemias/economía , Neumonía Viral/economía , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Rural , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA